Uranium mining in the Bancroft area

In the 1950s, the small village of Bancroft, Ontario experienced rapid growth as a result of uranium mining.[1][2]

In the context of minerals and mining the "Bancroft area" includes Haliburton, Hastings, and Renfrew counties, and all areas between Minden and Lake Clear.[3]

After the invention of atomic energy in 1942, the Canadian government encouraged prospecting for uranium. Uranium was found in small quantities in many parts of Canada, and was founded in concentrated places around the south of the Canadian Shield, with the Bicroft Mine, near Bancroft, being the first operational mine. In Ontario, other than the Bancroft area, uranium is also found in mineable quantities around Elliot Lake and Agnew Lake.[4]

By 1958, Canada had became one of the world's leading producers of uranium; the $274 million of uranium exports that year represented Canada's most significant mineral export.[5] By 1962 and 1963 the government was buying more than $1,500 million of uranium from Canadian producers for export, but soon thereafter the global supply of uranium increased, prices fell and the government cancelled all contracts to buy.[6]

Ancient history

During the ice age, in what is the Bancroft area today, ancient glaciers removed soil and rock, exposing the precambrian granite that used to be the heart of volcanic mountains on the sea bed. The volcanic eruptions spouted through sediments recrystallizing them into layers of banded gneisses including limestone, graphite, gabbro and diorite producing iron and other dark minerals.[1]

The ore mined in Faraday Township (i.e. Faraday Mine/Madawaska Mine, Greyhawk Mine) is between 992 million and 1088 million years old. The Cardiff rock, sometimes called the Silver Crater or Fission property in earlier writing (i.e. Dyno Mine, Bicroft Mine) is 1,000 million years old.[7]

Geology and mineralogy

In Canada 99% of uranium occurrences and 93% of properties producing uranium are on the Canadian Shield; almost all on the western and southern edges of it.[4]

Bancroft is one of only a few places in the world and the only area in Canada where uranium is extracted from pegmatitic rock.[5]

The key geological features in the Bancroft area relevant to uranium mining are three circular granitic complexes, each 10 kilometers in diameters. They were named by Ontario Department of Mines cartographer D. F. Hewitt in 1957 (and quoted in page 178 of[5]) as Cheddar granite (the most westerly complex), Cardiff plutonic complex (the central complex) and Faraday granite (the most eastern complex).[5]

Cheddar granite

Hewitt described the Cheddar complex as:

"a circular double dome of granitic rock, six miles (10 km) in diameter, mantled by limy paragneiss, para-amphibolite, and pyroxene granulite all of which are intruded and partly replaced by syenitic and granitic rocks."[5]

Cardiff plutonic complex

Located north of Cheddar granite, the Cardiff complex was described by Hewitt as:

"the shape of a cylinder plunging to the southeast and consists of three main intrusive sheets: the Centre Lake granite, the Monck Lake granite, and the Deer Lake syenite. It also is flanked by metasediments intruded and replaced by syenitic and granitic rocks; much sedimentary material occurs in wide bands within the plutonic complex."[5]

Faraday complex

Located east of the others, the Faraday complex, as described by Hewitt, is a:

"south-dipping granite sheet forming the south margin of the Hastings Highland gneiss complex. It is overlain by a zone of mixed hybrid gneisses including metasediments, granitic and syenite rocks and metagabbro. The three intrusive complexes and their flanking metasediments show more or less concentric trend-lines."[5]

Mining history before uranium was discovered (1886 to 1922)

Prior to the 1922 discovery of uranium, mica, feldspar, and other minerals were mined on a small scale in the Bancroft area.[5] Inspired by finds of gold in nearby Eldorado (now known as Madoc) in 1886/7 and onwards, many hoped also to find gold around Bancroft. More than 1,600 identifiable minerals and non-metallic collectibles can be found in the area.[1]

Gems

Aside from uranium, Bancroft area and its' mines produce sought-after gem stones of 175 species, most notably calcite, clinohumite, corundum, diopside, dravite, edenite, euxenite-(Y), ferri-fluoro-katophorite, fluorapatite, fluorite, fluoro-richterite, ilmenite, kainosite-(Y), molybdenite, nepheline, phlogopite, crystals of the pyrochlore supergroup, thorite, titanite, tremolite, uraninite, uranophane, and zircon. Madawaska Mine produced samples of the very rare kainosite-(Y), globally renowned samples of the common calcite and flourite, "superb" samples of ilmenite, "fine" samples of molybdenite, and the best known samples of molybdenite.[3]

Other resources

Surface gold was found in October 1897 by R. Bradshaw between Bobcaygeon and Bancroft (20 miles from Bancroft), triggering a rush of prospectors to the area who discovered the following resources:[1]

Resources (other than uranium and gems) extracted in the Bancroft area
Resource Locations mined From
Gold Bancroft 1897
Copper Dungannon, Cardiff, Maynooth 1899
Mica Cardiff, Paudash Lake 1899
Iron Coe Hill, Mayo (now Carlow/Mayo), Egan Creek (now Bancroft) 1882
Magnetic ore, arsenical pyrites and quartz Bradshaw 1882
Corundum Carlow, Raglan 1898
Marble Faraday, Dungannon 1911
Sodalite Bancroft, Dungannon 1905

Discovery of uranium (1922 to 1952)

Uranium was first discovered in the area of Cardiff in 1922 by W. M. Richardson[1] at a location first called "the Richardson deposit" and later known as "the Fission property".[5] Between 1929 and 1931,[5] attempts were made to extract radon from the uranium ore.[4]

In 1943,[5] in the aftermath of World War II, global interest in mining uranium escalated,[4] and the government sent geologists, who concluded at the time that they were not viable due to accessibility, size and uranium concentration.[5]

1948 saw an increase in private staking for uranium, but due to the difficulties in extracting uranium from lower grade ore, none developed into mines. In 1953 "intelligence prospecting and excellent preliminary explorations" by G. W. Burns and R. J. Steele discovered the Central Lake deposits (which later were developed into Bicroft Mine) and Arthur Shore (whose prospect became the Faraday Mine) led the way successful prospecting.[5]

Messrs. Burns, Steele and Shore were three of one hundred area prospects were established in the Bancroft area between 1953 and 1956.[1] At the same time, another ten mines were started in the Elliot Lake area.[8]

Uranium mining (1952 to 1982)

Former uranium mines near Bancroft

In the early 1950s, four mines started in the Bancroft area.

Bicroft Mine

Mining operations

In 1952 G. W. Burns, a well studied amateur prospector from Peterborough found deposits near Cardiff township, 10 miles southwest of Bancroft, near Paudash Lake. In an 18 Dec 1955 letter to the Geographical Survey of Canada, Mr Burns stated:[5]

"I always was interested in rock and minerals but did not know very much about what I was looking at and purchased a piece of property in Cardiff Twp. on which was a nice large showing of what I was told was molybdenite but after purchasing property found out it was only large flake graphite (and by the way I still hold this so called molybdenite deposit). This was in 1948 so right there I decided to try and get a knowledge of what I was looking at to some extent, and studied all the books in our Peterboro Public Library including government mineral reports of all kinds but, one book I acquired and I think I got it from your department, was called 'Prospecting for Uranium and Thorium in Canada' which gave me the information which resulted in my finding the original showing at Bicroft. In an old report in the library here which was printed I think in 1912 on the mineral mica I read of a showing in Cardiff Twp. composed of very large plates of phlogopite and went to Mr. Howard Sarginson to see if he could tell me where this old pit was as he lived on adjoining lot, but he had never saw nor heard of it, but was willing to go with me to show me Centre Lake which I had never been to. As we were walking along an old wagon road I saw where a wheel of a steel rimmed wagon had slipped across the face of a rock exposure and it was covered with a purplish coloured dust and upon chipping it with my hammer found it to be very deep purple fluorspar and by the book (Prospecting for Uranium and Thorium) the colour was due to a radioactive mineral in the same vicinity, and at the next exposure about 75 yards north I found a crystal about t inch diameter completely surrounded by radial fractures of 1-2 inches in length which the same book said was caused by the radioactivity of the crystal inside the fractures, I dug the crystal out and brought it home and the next day went back with my son and looked around some more and found several nice surface samples which due to colour of oxide on them I thought must be associated with uranium, but I did not own a geiger counter and only knew where there was one in Peterboro which was owned by Mr. Robert Steele so I took my samples to him to have them checked on his counter and he said they read very high and could we get together and get some ground staked in partnership before the news got out, which we started to do the next day but as neither of us had ever staked a claim before we did not get as much ground covered as we should have, due to being too painstaking in sighting lines, measuring claims, etc. and then the word got out and we were surrounded by staked claims so we rented a Warsop rock drill and blew out some trenches from which we sent samples to your department for mineral identification and among which were uraninite."[5]

In late 1952, Mr Burns sold his property to a Toronto syndicate that formed into the Centre Lake Uranium Mines Limited, lead by C. C. Huston. The company worked on the surface, opened an adit and started diamond drilling, mostly to 100 feet, sometimes to 50 feet. A shaft was created in 1954. Simultaneous to this, Croft Uranium Mines Limited, a subsidiary of Macassa Lines Limited formed in 1953. They discovered uranium north of the original site. In 1955 the two sites were merged under the ownership of Bicroft Uranium Mines Limited, with work centering around the Centre Lake part of the property. A shaft was sunk to 1,300 feet and ten levels created. The treatment plant capable of processing 1,000 tons of ore a day was built and operations started in late 1956. 1957 production was 414,024 tons per day, valued at $18.92 per ton. Production increased to 1,300 a day in 1958 and exploration started to the south of the site.[5]

The mine employed up to 500 people at its peak.[9]

Mining continued until 1963 producing a total of 2,470,000 tonnes of uranium ore.[10] 2,284,421 tonnes of tailings remain on site in two impoundments.[11]

Repairs to the decommissioned site, included adding vegetation over the tailings, were completed in 1980. Subsequent upgrades of the dams was completed in the 1990s.[12][13][14] The site is now a wetlands.[15]

Geology

The geology of Bicroft mine was described by Geological Survey of Canada in 1962[5] as follows:

"The deposits are in a northerly trending belt of paragneiss and amphibolite forming the east flank of the Centre Lake granite sheet, which is part of the Cardiff plutonic complex described the rocks of the favourable zone as biotite paragneiss, amphibolite, scapolite-biotite gneiss, garnet-sillimanite-biotite paragneiss, and a narrow band of silicated marble. These are intruded and replaced by lenticular 'dykes' of both sodic and potassic syenite and granite and related rocks in a zone about half a mile wide extending for about 3.5 miles. Satterly stated that it appears to be terminated to the north by a fault. The 'dykes' range from a few feet to 80 feet in width and from a few feet to 400 feet in length. They are arranged in an en échelon fashion, striking northerly and dipping from 40° to 70°E, commonly transgressing slightly the attitude of the host rocks. The ore minerals are uranothorite and uraninite, accompanied locally by allanite, zircon, titanite, apatite, fluorite, pyrite, pyrrhotite and molybdenite. Satterly listed pyrochlore, betafite anatase and umangite as rare accessory minerals. Mafic minerals are pyroxene and biotite, some bodies containing considerable pyroxene. In contrast to the mafic shoots at the Faraday mine, those at the Bicroft contain little magnetite. Red alteration occurs locally, particularly at contacts with sillimanitegarnet-biotite gneiss and where reddish feldspar is present in amphibolite. Uranium to thorium ratios vary in different bodies, thorium being more abundant in the pyroxene granite."[5]

Faraday Mine/Madawaska Mine

Mining operations as Faraday Mine (1948–1964)

Arthur H. Shore, an independent prospector, first found uranium at his lot on Faraday township in 1948 or 1949. He founded Faraday Uranium Mines Limited in 1949, but injured himself shortly afterwards. Newkirk Mining Corporation lead work in 1952, including diamond drilling in December 1952 which helped identify seven main zones of uranium ore. 1953 drilling discovered more uranium up to 500 feet underground. 1954 drilling found more uranium and adits were created. By 1955 it was established that there was 1,660,980 tons of ore that was 0.112% U3O8. A sale price was agreed in January 1956. A 863 feet deep shaft was sunk from an adit, from which five levels were established. A treatment plant with a 750 ton-per-day capacity was built and operations started in April 1957. In 1958, the treatment capacity was increased to 1,350 tons per day in order to support processing of ore from Greyhawk Mine. 1957 production or uranium was 405,271 pounds of ore that was 0.0859% U3O8.[5] Between 1948 and 1964 Faraday Mine had produced $54 million of ore.[1]

Mining operations as Madawaska Mine (1975–1982)

After $7 million of investment to rehabilitate the mine,[1] it reopened as the Madawaska Mine in 1975 and production continued to 1982. The shaft into the uranium-bearing pegmatite reached a depth of 473 metres (1,552 ft).[16] During this period, the mine was producing 1,500 ton of ore per day.[1]

Decommissioning (1982–present)

Since inspections found improper surface protection of tailing in 2015, the mine has been undergoing rehabilitation.[13]

Geology

The geology of Faraday Mine/Madawaska Mine mine was described by Geological Survey of Canada in 1962[5] as follows:

"The deposits are in a belt of metagabbro and amphibolite on the south flank of the Faraday granite. These mafic rocks strike east and dip fairly steeply to the south.

The orebodies are parts of a system of pegmatitic granite dykes found at intervals over a distance of about 6,000 feet and a width of several hundred feet. Some of the material in the dykes appears to be of metasomatic origin. The predominant trend is N70 °E, with fairly regular dips of 50° to 60 °SE (staff of Faraday Uranium Mines, 19 57). Dips are commonly flatter, however, in the lower levels. The dykes are irregular in shape, and the lenticular ore shoots within them are even more irregularly and erratically distributed. The average stoping width was stated to be 17 feet, and the maximum sustained stoping width 60 feet. Close study by mine geologists, use of portable counters underground, and unusually careful car sampling were used to control the grade of material mined.

An orebody may consist of a series of irregular lenses of better-grade material. Ore shoots commonly occur at the margins of a mass of pegmatitic granite. In some places the bodies conform with the attitude of the host rock, even following structures that appear to be minor folds, and in other places they transgress the host rock. The staff reported that no consistent control over pegmatite emplacement had been noted, that folding or faulting later than the pegmatitic granite had not been recognized, and that fractures are rare although lenses of recrystallized breccia had been found locally.

The principal ore minerals are uraninite and uranothorite. Other radioactive minerals are allanite, cyrtolite, uranophane and beta-uranophane, and rare earth minerals containing cerium and lanthanum. The uranium to thorium ratio is about 2 to l. Satterly (1957, p. 111) stated that the rocks of the ore shoots are leucogranite, pyroxene granite (or syenite )-pegmatite, and magnetite or magnetitepyroxene bodies in 'pegmatite'. The staff reported that criteria for the presence of orebodies include hematite staining; abundant ferromagnesian minerals, including augite and hornblende; the presence of large tabular inclusions of country rock; and frequently the presence of magnetite, particularly in the richer zones. One of the last-named mafic bodies, about 13 feet wide and 240 feet long and reported to average 0.40 per cent U 30 8 , occurred in the upper part of the mine (see Fig. 17, largest body) and was responsible for early high-grade intersections. It provided rich ore for blending with lower-grade material, some of which was reported to contain only 0.07 per cent U3O8."[5]

Dyno Mine

Mining operations

Prospector Paul Mullette discovered radioactive occurrences in November 1953 that were sold to Dyno Mines Limited, who later changed their name to Canadian Dyno Mines Limited. The company undertook diamond drilling that same month simultaneous to geological mapping. This identified three zones, resulting in drilling, which discovered two more zones. Surface diamond drilling of 124 holes at 200 feet intervals occurred through 1954 and 1955. A 1,000 feet shaft, in the "B" zone, was sunk creating five levels. A price to sell uranium was agreed, an ore treatment plant with 1,000 tons per day capacity was started in 1956. Production started in May 1958.[5]

Geology

The geology of Dyno mine was described by Geological Survey of Canada in 1962[5] as follows:

The deposits are in a belt of paragneiss, para-amphibolite, and other rocks at the east flank of the Cheddar granite, striking about N25 °W and dipping about 50°E. The host rock of the orebodies is commonly biotitehornblende-feldspar gneiss.

The orebodies and potential ore zones consist of a series of northerly striking pegmatitic granite dykes, dipping about 50°E. They are nearly conformable with their metasedimentary host rocks but crosscutting relationships can be seen locally. The five zones are almost in line and may be connected at depth. Each zone contains numerous branching dykes of different widths, but all are lenticular.

All dykes are not of ore grade, and the widest rarely contain ore. Dykes that do contain ore may do so only in certain parts.

The dyke system on which the shaft was sunk was explored extensively for a length of 800 feet and to a depth of more than 1,000 feet, dykes being from 3 to 60 feet wide. Vallance and Skrecky (1957) reported that "where the dykes are narrow, in the order of 12 feet or less, mineable grade across the full dyke width exists. In the wider dykes, only a portion of the dyke may contain a sufficient concentration of uraniferous minerals to make ore grade. Such lenses are not confined to any single portion of the dyke and may occur in the centre or along either wall or cross from one wall to the other. Tenor of ore within the lenses varies from 0.05 per cent U3 0 8 to in excess of 1.00 per cent U3 0 8 ." Two sets of narrow fractures have been observed. One set strikes N20 °W and the other strikes nearly north; the ore is nearly always associated with the latter.

The uranium-bearing minerals are uraninite and uranothorite. Other radioactive minerals are allanite and cyrtolite. Peristerite and magnetite are common in the ore. The ore of higher grade usually exhibits a dark red coloration and an increase in magnetite content. Underground exploration was said to have revealed better grades and tonnages than were indicated by drilling. Ore reserves were estimated by the company to average 0.093 per cent U3O8."[5]

Greyhawk Mine

Mining operations (1955–1959)

Radioactive materials were first discovered in Faraday Township in 1955 by K. D. Thompson and M. Card, two employees of Goldhawk Porcupine Mines Limited who were surveying with geiger counters. Messrs. Thompson and Card found exposed rock in a 60-foot by 300-foot area. Diamond drilling followed at 50 to 400 feet intervals at 450 feet depth. A shaft was sunk in 1956 and three levels created.[5]

Ore was transferred for processing at the Faraday Mine site, starting August 1957 at a rate of about 200 tons per day. By the end of 1957, 19,568 tons at a value of $11.40 per ton was shipped. Through 1958 production was 150 tons per day averaging at 0.082% U3O8.[5]

Ownership subsequently shifted to Goldhawk Porcupine Mines Limited.[5]

Mining operations stopped in 1959.[1][13]

Mining operations (1962–1982)

Faraday Uranium Mines Limited purchased the site in 1962.[17][18]

Madawaska Mines Limited was formed in 1975 and purchased the mine, as well as the Faraday Mine. Mining operations restarted in 1976 and continued until 1982.[17][4]

Geology

The geology of Greyhawk mine was described by Geological Survey of Canada in 1962[5] as follows:

"The zone consists of easterly striking dykes of pegmatitic granite intruding metagabbro. The dykes, which pinch and swell, vary in width from 1 foot to 60 feet, dip 30° to 60°S, and generally follow the gneissosity of the country rock. Inclusions of wall-rocks lie here and there within the dykes. The ore minerals are uraninite and uranothorite. The ore shoots within the dykes have an average length of about 100 feet, an average width of 6 feet, and a slope depth of from 50 to 100 feet. Higher concentrations of radioactive minerals occur where the host rock is richer in mafic minerals and where it is much fractured; most dykes and ore zones within the dykes are narrower than those at Bicroft; variable amounts of chlorite occur with the ore; the ore is never found in the metagabbro but commonly in contact with it; no high grade deposits have been found to date, and the average grade of the ore is probably slightly lower than that at other orebodies being mined in the Bancroft camp. Fockler (personal communication) stated that the development grade was about 10 per cent below the grade indicated by surface diamond drilling, and that the tonnage outlined in underground development work, as of November 1, 1957, was about 30 per cent below the tonnage indicated by surface diamond drilling...The ore was reported in 1957 to average 0.095 per cent U3O8."[5]

After mining, the uranium ore was treated in acid leaching plants located at the mines. The leaching process produced "yellowcake" high-grade uranium compounds which were either process further at the Port Hope refinery or sold to USA government for processing there. Processing uranium ore in Bancroft cost $3.00 per ton.[6]

The influence of global economics, politics and local infrastructure

Economic growth

Eldorado Mining and Refining Limited was the crown company that purchased all uranium oxide in Canada and it entered into contracts with mine owners at fixed prices.[19]

Faraday Mine alone produced $54 million of uranium ore, creating a rapid economic boom. Mine workers unionized in 1957, forming Local 1006 Bancroft Mine and Mill Worker's Union.[1]

The success of the mine was due to a combination of factors, and not simply because of Arthur Shore's discovery of uranium. The factors that resulted in economically viable mines were Bancroft's geographical proximity to industrial centers (Port Hope), a good road and rail network.[20]

Employment of miners in Bancroft started in 1955, peaked in 1958 at around 1,600 jobs.[19]

Housing for miners was quickly established around the mines and in nearby Bancroft village, which extended to cover four square miles. Other construction quickly followed, including, two single-men's bunkhouses, a canteen, an eleven-room school, an ice-curling rink, and a recreation center. In 1957 a swimming pool was started.[21]

Decline of global demand for uranium

The combination of a global decline in demand for uranium (specifically the cancellation of a contract to buy by Agip[22]) combined with the more efficient extraction occurring in Ontario near Elliot Lake,[20] closed the remaining mines in 1964 destroying the local economy. Local catholic priest Rev. Henry Maloney, whose two brothers were former Ontario Ombudsman Arthur Maloney, and Minster of Mines James Anthony Maloney, led the community to demand support from the Government of Ontario and Government of Canada to extend the contracts for buying uranium. Canadian Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, relying on a old agreement with the United Kingdom to buy uranium from Canada, was able to prolong the life of the mine by eighteen months, giving the community enough time to plan for the closure.[1]

Regulatory environment

Licenses for uranium mines and mills were issues by the Atonic Energy Control Board of Canada, but their regulation of uranium mines did not start until 1977. As a result of this, mines that closed prior to 1977 (i.e. Bicroft and Dyno Mines) were able to abandon the mines without any regulatory oversight. Because the other two mines (i.e. Faraday Mine/Madawaska Mine and Greyhawk Mine) both restarted mining in 1976 until 1982, their operation and closure was done with regulatory oversight.[4] Greyhawk Mines tailings were processed at the mill located at Madawaska Mine, and therefore there are no tailings on site. As a consequence of this, the primary hazards that are regulated are absent at Greyhawk and present at Faraday/Madawaska Mine, resulted in ongoing environmental monitoring by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.[23]

The legacy of uranium mining (1982 to present day)

Cultural legacy

After the closure of the mines, the various tailing site attracted mineral collectors, especially to an annual "gemboree" in which tourists travelled to Bancroft in search of gems and minerals.[1][24]

Remaining subterranean uranium

200,000 tons of ore, averaging 0.065% U3O8, remain in the ground at Greyhawk Mine.[17] Dyno Mine ran out of uranium ore in 1960.[21]

In 2007, the Globe and Mail newspaper reported on a $3 million uranium development project in nearby Haliburton.[25]

Environmental legacy

1978 and 1980 studies found that the natural weathering of the granite and gabbro rocks left on at Greyhawk Mine has caused uranium leaching into the aquifer at concentrations ranging between 1.2 to 380 parts per billion, with higher concentrations measured deeper in the water table and in sediments.[26][27]

Tailings remain at Bicroft, Madawaska and Dyno sites where water sampling by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is ongoing.[8] 2019 sampling found radioactive and hazardous contamination in two of several water samples.[13] Subsequent inspections in 2020 from nearby locations reported no contamination.[28]

Legacy corporate liabilities

Dyno, Greyhawk, and Madawaska Mines are now managed by E.W.L Management Limited[13] (a subsidiary of Ovintiv[29]). Bicroft Mine is owned by Barrick Gold; the owners of all legacy tailing sites at former mines are responsible for the ongoing management of the sites.[13]

Silicosis

In the 1970s, the scientific community was making connections between uranium mining and silicosis in miners. Uranium mining produces silica-laden dust and the health risk to miners is correlated to the amount of free silica in the uranium ore. Whereas the uranium mines in Elliot Lake produced ore with a free silica rate of 60 to 70 per cent, the dust from the miners around Bancroft had 5 to 15% free silica, thus presenting some risk to miners, but much less than that of the Elliot Lake's uranium mines. In 1974, the Ontario Workmen's Compensation Board studied 15,094 people who worked in uranium mines in Bancroft and around Elliot Lake for at least one month, between 1955 and 1974. Of those 15,094 people, 94 silicosis cases were found in 1974, of which one was attributable to working a Bancroft mine - i.e. the other 93 were attributable to working in an Elliot Lake mine.[19]

Exposure to ionizing radiation and lung cancer

Mines produce radon gas which can increase lung cancer risks. Miners exposure to radiation was not measured before 1958 and exposure limits were not enacted until 1968. Risks to miners at Bancroft and Elliot Lake mines were investigated and the official report of that investigation quotes a miner:[19]

"We have been led to believe through the years hat the working environment in these mines was safe for us to work in. We have been deceived."[19]

The aforementioned 1974 study of 15,094 Ontario uranium miners found 81 former miners who died of lung caner. Factoring in predicted lung cancer rate for men in Ontario, led to the conclusion that by 1974 there were 36 more deaths than expected attributable to both Bancroft and Elliot Lake mines, with the additional risk being twice as high for Bancroft miners compared to Elliot Lake miners.[19]

A 2015 report on study commissioned by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and undertaken by the Occupational Cancer Research Centre at Cancer Care Ontario tracked the health of 28,959 former uranium miners over 21 years and concluded that:

"There was about a two-fold increase in the risk of lung cancer mortality (RR= 2.32, 95% CI: 1.72-3.14) and lung cancer incidence (RR=1.89, 95% CI: 1.43-2.50) with a five year lag interval incorporated in the highest cumulative exposure category of >100 WLM. For lung cancer mortality, this relationship was modified by attained age, time since first exposure, time since last exposure, exposure rate, age at first exposure, and dose rate. For lung cancer incidence, this relationship was modified by time since first exposure, time since last exposure and exposure rate."[30]

The BMJ reported:

"An increased risk of lung cancer and a dose–response relationship was observed with cumulative radon exposure. Miners exposed to >100 WLM demonstrated a twofold increase in the risk of lung cancer incidence (RR=1.89, CI 1.43 to 2.50)."[31]

The study will be updated in 2023.[32]

See also

References

  1. Reynolds, Nila (1979). Bancroft. A Bonanza of Memories. The Bancroft Centennial Committee. pp. 184–193, 223.
  2. "Bancroft Historical Timeline". Bancroft Town Official Website.
  3. McDougall, Raymond (2019-09-03). "Mineral Highlights from the Bancroft Area, Ontario, Canada". Rocks & Minerals. 94 (5): 408–419. doi:10.1080/00357529.2019.1619134. ISSN 0035-7529.
  4. "Radioactive and toxic wastes from the Bancroft unranium sites. Where are we going and who is in charge?" (PDF). Canadian Institute for Radiation Safety. 1 May 1987.
  5. A.H. Lang, J. W. Griffith, H. R Steacy (1962). Canadian Deposits of Uranium and Thorium (PDF). Yukon University: Geological Survey of Canada - Department of Mines and Technical Surveys. p. 175.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. Robertson, James A.; Gould, Kerry L. (1983). Ontario Geological Survey Mineral Deposits Circular 25. Uranium and Thorium Deposits of Northern Ontario. International Atomic Energy Agency online library: Ministry of Northern Affairs. p. 1.
  7. "Geology of the Canadian Sites". www.csun.edu. Retrieved 2021-11-27.
  8. "Uranium mines and mills waste". Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. 2014-02-03. Retrieved 2021-11-25.
  9. "Uranium Citizens Inquiry". www.uraniumcitizensinquiry.com. Retrieved 2021-11-25.
  10. Parsons, Michael B.; Friske, Peter W. B.; Laidlow, Allison M.; Jamieson, Heather E. (2014). "Abstract: Controls on Uranium, Rare Earth Element, and Radionuclide Mobility at the Decommissioned Bicroft Uranium Mine, Ontario". Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  11. "Characterization of uranium and rare earth element mobility and attenuation downstream of decomissioned tailings impoundments at the Bicroft Uranium Mine near Bancroft, Ontario - ProQuest". www.proquest.com. Retrieved 2021-11-25.
  12. "Sampling near old mine sites finds 'no expected health impacts'". Haliburton Echo. 2020-10-06. Retrieved 2021-11-22.
  13. "Independent Environmental Monitoring Program: Dyno, Bicroft, and Madawaska Mines". Canadian Nuclear Safety Comission. 2020-09-21. Retrieved 2021-11-22.
  14. "Subsurface Investigations and Condition of Dams: Bicroft Mine Site Bancroft, Ontario · U-Links Centre For Community Based Research". database.ulinks.ca. Retrieved 2021-11-22.
  15. Canada, Library and Archives (2019-03-08). "Search - Theses Canada". www.bac-lac.gc.ca. Retrieved 2021-11-22.
  16. http://www.mindat.org/loc.php?loc=542&ob=4 data from Geological Survey of Canada Miscellaneous Report 39 -- mindat.org
  17. "Mineral Deposit Inventory Record MDI31F04SW00036: Greyhawk Mine, Greyhawk". www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca. Retrieved 2021-11-25.
  18. "Greyhawk Mine, Faraday Township, Hastings County, Ontario, Canada". www.mindat.org. Retrieved 2021-11-25.
  19. Ham, James M. (1976). "Report of the Royal Commission on the Health and Safety of Workers in Mines". Ontario Royal Commission on the Health and Safety of Workers in Mines.
  20. Michèle Proulx, Michèle (1997). "The Uranium Mining industry of the Bancroft Area: an Environmental History and Heritage Assessment" (PDF). p. 56-57.
  21. Voisin, Stella (28 July 2007). "Report on The Caring for Kids in Cardiff Research Project" (PDF). Fay And Associates.
  22. "Mineral Deposit Inventory Record MDI31F04SW00037: Faraday, Madawaska". www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca. Retrieved 2021-11-27.
  23. "Record of Proceedings. Request for Exemption from Licensing the Greyhawk and Agnew Lake Closed Uranium Mines without Tailings" (PDF). Canadian Nuclear Safety Comission. 11 May 2012.
  24. "Rockhound Gemboree". Bancroft Town Official Website.
  25. Ebner, David (2007-12-27). "Uranium exploration plan stirs health fears". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2021-11-27.
  26. Bin Daud, Mohamad (June 1980). "A Study of Uranium in Ground Water Around Greyhawk Mine, Bancroft, Ontario". McMaster University.
  27. Veska, E. (Waterloo Univ., Ontario (Canada)); Cherry, J.A. (Waterloo Univ., Ontario (Canada)); Sharma, H.D. (Waterloo Univ., Ontario (Canada)) (October 1983). "Origin and subsurface migration of radionuclides from waste rock at an abandoned uranium mine near Bancroft, Ontario". University of Ottawa via Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa, Ontario (Canada).CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  28. Davis, Greg (29 September 2020). "3 decommissioned uranium mines near Bancroft, Ont. deemed protected, no health impacts: study". Global News. Vancouver, British Columbia. Retrieved 11 October 2021.
  29. Lye, Dave (1 May 2014). "EWL Legacy Mine Properties Perpetual Management Strategy" (PDF). International Atomic Energy Agency.
  30. "Ontario Uranium Miners Cohort Study Report" (PDF). February 2015 via University of Toronto Library. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  31. Navaranjan, Garthika; Berriault, Colin; Do, Minh; Villeneuve, Paul J.; Demers, Paul A. (2016-12-01). "Cancer incidence and mortality from exposure to radon progeny among Ontario uranium miners". Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 73 (12): 838–845. doi:10.1136/oemed-2016-103836. ISSN 1351-0711. PMID 27651479.
  32. M, Charles; July 22nd 2021, el | News | (2021-07-22). "Are Canadian uranium workers still more likely to die from lung cancer?". Canada's National Observer. Retrieved 2021-11-27.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.