Adjustment of status
Adjustment of status in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of the United States refers to the legal process of any alien becoming an immigrant and/or a permanent resident (green card holder). Under the INA, the status of every refugee is statutorily and automatically adjusted to an immigrant after his or her admission into the United States.[1][2][3][4] To obtain a green card for the very first time, all aliens are required to file an adjustment of status application (Form I-485).[5]
| U.S. citizenship and immigration |
|---|
| Immigration |
| Citizenship |
| Agencies |
| Legislation |
| History |
| Relevant legislation |
|
|
Filing and approval process
Refugees
Refugees seeking admission to the United States under INA section 207, 8 U.S.C. § 1157,[1][4] are not required under any law to file any adjustment of status application.[3][6] Their status is automatically adjusted by the Refugee Act to that of an immigrant upon their lawful entry into the United States.[4][3][2][7] After residing as legal immigrants for at least one year,[3] they may then apply for a green card.[4] This can be done by filing a Form I-485 ("Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status"),[8] or visiting the nearest center of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).[4][3]
Those who have previously been admitted as stateless refugees under section 1157 very rarely become inadmissible as a result of a common criminal conviction.[2][7][9] In the event any such person knowingly departs from the United States or is forcefully deported, he or she can at any time re-enter the country at any port of entry (without a consent from anyone).[3][10][4] Anything to the contrary could lead to deprivation of rights under color of law, which is a crime that entails capital punishment.[11]
Non-refugees
In all other cases,[5] the alien must actually file an application for adjustment of status (Form I-485) or cancellation of removal (EOIR-42A),[12] which could take between one year and several years for approval.[5] In order to apply for permanent residency, the applicant must not be "removable" from the United States.[13] If he or she is the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition (family or employment-based), the priority date must be current (if applicable). The application (Form I-485) must be accompanied by a sealed envelope from a designated civil surgeon who performed a medical examination on the alien applicant.[5] The USCIS has waived the rule on filing Form I-693, Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record, until September 30, 2022.[14]
Once the application package (I-485, I-693, and the filing fees) is received, the applicant will receive the receipt number.[5] This receipt number can be used to track the case online.[15] In most employment-based applications, the petition will be approved within four months and a green card will automatically be mailed. In some cases, a face to face interview is required. This is often done in marriage-based applications to ensure that the marriage is bona fide, meaning genuine and not a sham marriage.
After filing the adjustment of status forms, the application will be considered abandoned if the applicant leaves the United States (a few exceptions apply). This can be mitigated by filing for a humanitarian parole (Form I-131) and an Employment Authorization Document (Form I-765). Once the humanitarian parole and Form I-765 are approved, the applicant will receive the Employment Authorization Document which will also serve as advance parole (if endorsed as such).
In exceptional cases when the adjustment of status is approved, but an immigrant visa number is not immediately available, the approval will be postponed indefinitely until such a number becomes available. This can be the case when the applicable priority date retrogresses during the time of adjudication. In such cases, it is common that Form I-765 and the advance parole are renewed every year.
Former 2019 public charge rule
Based on a rule promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in August 2019, from February 24, 2020 to March 8, 2021, every applicant for adjustment of status in the United States, except for those who fall under exceptions, had to submit form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency. The form called for information related, among other things, to the applicant's assets and liabilities, health insurance, bankruptcy filings, past Immigration Fee waiver requests, applicant's education and occupational skills and more. The form was based on the Public Charge Rule adopted by the DHS.[16]
On November 2, 2020, a U.S. district court vacated the Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds final rule, 84 Fed. Reg. 41,292 (Aug. 14, 2019), as amended by Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds; Correction, 84 Fed. Reg. 52,357 (Oct. 2, 2019) (Public Charge Final Rule) nationwide. That decision was stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On March 9, 2021, the Seventh Circuit lifted its stay and the district court's order that vacated the DHS's rule went into effect. On March 9, 2021, the DHS successfully moved to dismiss its own appeal before the Seventh Circuit. It then immediately implemented the judgment, i.e., the vacatur of the August 2019 rule. That rule was repealed (discontinued) on March 9, 2021 and Form I-944 has been discontinued and should not be filed by anyone.[17][18][19]
Notes and references
This article in most part is based on law of the United States, including statutory and latest published case law.
- "Posos-Sanchez v. Garland, 3 F.4th 1176". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Casetext.com. July 7, 2021. p. 1182-83.
The INA generally defines the words 'admission' and 'admitted' as 'the lawful entry of the alien into the United States after inspection and authorization by an immigration officer.'
- "Matter of D-K-, 25 I&N Dec. 761" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. April 12, 2012. p. 766.
With regard to refugees, the language of both the Act and the regulations states that they are 'admitted' to the United States.
- "Matter of D-K-, 25 I&N Dec. 761" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. April 12, 2012. p. 766.
- "Matter of H-N-, 22 I&N Dec. 1039" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. October 13, 1999. p. 1042.
As correctly stated by the Service, 8 CFR 209.1 is the sole regulation applicable to refugees attempting to adjust status. That section mandates that every alien granted refugee status must appear before an immigration officer 1 year after entry to determine his or her admissibility and, therefore, eligibility to adjust status.
(emphases added)- "Matter of C-A-S-D-, 27 I&N Dec. 692". Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. November 1, 2019. p. 694.
Section 209(c) of the Act provides that the Attorney General may waive certain criminal grounds of inadmissibility under section 212(a) of the Act 'with respect to such an alien for humanitarian purposes, to assure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest.'
(emphasis added) - "Matter of Garcia-Alzugaray, 19 I&N Dec. 407" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. August 25, 1986.
- "I-602, Application by Refugee for Waiver of Inadmissibility Grounds". U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. October 28, 2020. Retrieved 2021-11-29.
- "Matter of C-A-S-D-, 27 I&N Dec. 692". Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. November 1, 2019. p. 694.
- "Presidential Documents: Anti-Discrimination" (PDF). Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 28. U.S. Government Publishing Office. February 10, 1995. p. 7888.
Our efforts to combat illegal immigration must not violate the privacy and civil rights of legal immigrants and U.S. citizens. Therefore, I direct the Attorney General... and other relevant Administration officials to vigorously protect our citizens and legal immigrants from immigration-related instances of discrimination and harassment....
(emphases added)- ("The term 'immigrant' means every alien except an alien who is within one of the following classes of nonimmigrant aliens....")
- 8 U.S.C. § 1159 ("Adjustment of status of refugees")
- ("The provisions of subsection (a) shall not apply to an alien whom the Attorney General admits to the United States under section 1157 of this title.") (emphasis added)
- "Romanishyn v. Attorney General, 455 F.3d 175". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Harvard Law School. July 20, 2006. p. 185.
That the INA addresses termination of refugee status in only one provision——might suggest, as Mr. Romanishyn argues, that refugee status persists indefinitely unless it is terminated pursuant to that provision.
(emphasis added)- "Reznik v. U.S. Department of Justice, INS, 901 F. Supp. 188". U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Harvard Law School. March 28, 1995. p. 193.
Congress granted the President and Attorney General wide discretion in determining the admission of refugees to the United States.
- "Matter of B-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 119" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. May 3, 2013. p. 120 n.2.
- "Refugees". U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. September 23, 2020. Retrieved 2021-11-28.
- "Matter of B-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 119" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. May 3, 2013. p. 120 n.2.
- "Reznik v. U.S. Department of Justice, INS, 901 F. Supp. 188". U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Harvard Law School. March 28, 1995. p. 193.
- ("Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence")
- "Adjustment of Status". U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. September 25, 2020.
- "Alabama v. Bozeman, 533 U.S. 146 (2001)". U.S. Supreme Court. Harvard Law School. June 11, 2001. p. 153.
The word 'shall' is ordinarily the language of command.
(internal quotation marks omitted)- "Anderson v. Yungkau, 329 U.S. 482 (1947)". U.S. Supreme Court. Harvard Law School. January 13, 1947. p. 485.
And when the same Rule uses both 'may' and 'shall,' the normal inference is that each is used in its usual sense—the one act being permissive, the other mandatory.
- "Dessouki v. Attorney General, 915 F.3d 964". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Harvard Law School. February 14, 2019. p. 966.
[T]he word 'shall' imposes a mandatory requirement.
- "Orozco-Velasquez v. Attorney General, 817 F.3d 78". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Harvard Law School. March 11, 2016. p. 83. (same)
- "Dessouki v. Attorney General, 915 F.3d 964". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Harvard Law School. February 14, 2019. p. 966.
- "Anderson v. Yungkau, 329 U.S. 482 (1947)". U.S. Supreme Court. Harvard Law School. January 13, 1947. p. 485.
- "Matter of N-V-G-, 28 I&N Dec. 380". Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. September 17, 2021.
A person who enters the United States as a refugee and later adjusts in the United States to lawful permanent resident status is not precluded from establishing eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the [INA], 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) (2018), based on a conviction for an aggravated felony, because he or she has not 'previously been admitted to the United States as an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence' under that provision.
- "Matter of J-H-J-, 26 I&N Dec. 563" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. May 12, 2015.
- "Matter of Michel, 21 I&N Dec. 1101" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. January 30, 1998.
- "I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status". U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. November 8, 2020. Retrieved 2021-11-28.
- "Board of Immigration Appeals". U.S. Dept. of Justice. September 14, 2021.
BIA decisions are binding on all DHS officers and immigration judges....
- 8 CFR 1003.1(g)(1) ("Except as Board decisions may be modified or overruled by the Board or the Attorney General, decisions of the Board and decisions of the Attorney General are binding on all officers and employees of DHS or immigration judges in the administration of the immigration laws of the United States.")
- "Matter of Douglas, 26 I&N Dec. 197" (PDF). Board of Immigration Appeals. U.S. Dept. of Justice. October 17, 2013. p. 199.
The [Supreme] Court has also emphasized that the Chevron principle of deference must be applied to an agency's interpretation of ambiguous statutory provisions, even where a court has previously issued a contrary decision and believes that its construction is the better one, provided that the agency's interpretation is reasonable.
- "United States v. Ochoa, 861 F.3d 1010". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Harvard Law School. July 3, 2017. p. 1013.
[W]e hold that Defendant was not originally removable as charged, and so could not be convicted of illegal reentry. We therefore reverse the judgment of conviction.
- 18 U.S.C. § 242
- "Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law". U.S. Dept. of Justice. May 31, 2021.
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under 'color of law' include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials....
- "Federal Civil Rights Statutes". Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
- "Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law". U.S. Dept. of Justice. May 31, 2021.
- "List of Downloadable EOIR Forms". U.S. Dept. of Justice. November 23, 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-29.
- "Barton v. Barr, 140 S. Ct. 1442 (2020)". U.S. Supreme Court. Harvard Law School. April 23, 2020. p. 1446.
The umbrella statutory term for being inadmissible or deportable is 'removable.'
- "Tima v. Attorney General, 903 F.3d 272". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Harvard Law School. September 6, 2018. p. 277.
- "Galindo v. Sessions, 897 F.3d 894". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Harvard Law School. July 31, 2018. p. 897.
- "Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 1173". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Harvard Law School. May 7, 2007. p. 1177 n.2.
- "USCIS Temporarily Waiving 60-Day Rule for Civil Surgeon Signatures". U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. December 9, 2021. Retrieved 2021-12-09.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is temporarily waiving the requirement that the civil surgeon sign Form I-693, Report of Medical Examination and Vaccination Record, no more than 60 days before an applicant files an application for the underlying immigration benefit (including Form I-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status), until Sept. 30, 2022.
- "Case Status Online". U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Retrieved 2021-11-29.
- Shaw, Tejas; Badia-Tavas, Mercedes; Durham, Michael; Bruno, Mayra (17 February 2020). "Legal Permanent Residency Becomes More Challenging As New Public Charge Rule Goes Into Effect". National Law Review. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
- "Public Charge". U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. November 17, 2021. Retrieved 2021-11-29.
USCIS is no longer applying the August 2019 Public Charge Final Rule.
- "Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds; Implementation of Vacatur". Federal Register. National Archives. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
- "Declaration of Self Sufficiency". US Citizenship and Immigration Services. US Department of Homeland Security. Retrieved 14 August 2021.
External links
- USCIS: Case Status Online
- Adjustment of Status (Form I-485)