Longtermism

Longtermism, or long-termism, is a philosophical view which gives moral priority to positively influencing the long-term future. It is an important concept in effective altruism and serves as a primary motivation for efforts to reduce existential risks to humanity.[1]

Sigal Samuel from Vox summarizes the key argument for longtermism as follows: "future people matter morally just as much as people alive today; (...) there may well be more people alive in the future than there are in the present or have been in the past; and (...) we can positively affect future peoples' lives."[2]

Definition

Philosopher William MacAskill defines longtermism as "the view that positively influencing the longterm future is a key moral priority of our time".[3] He distinguishes it from strong longtermism, "the view that positively influencing the longterm future is the key moral priority of our time".[3]

In his book The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity, philosopher Toby Ord describes longtermism as follows: "longtermism (...) is especially concerned with the impacts of our actions upon the longterm future. It takes seriously the fact that our own generation is but one page in a much longer story, and that our most important role may be how we shape—or fail to shape—that story. Working to safeguard humanity's potential is one avenue for such a lasting impact and there may be others too."[4] In addition, Ord notes that "longtermism is animated by a moral re-orientation toward the vast future that existential risks threaten to foreclose."[4]

History and community

The term "longtermism" was coined around 2017 by Oxford philosophers William MacAskill and Toby Ord, and the view draws inspiration from the work of Nick Bostrom, Nick Beckstead, and others.[3]

Longtermist ideas have given rise to a community of individuals and organizations working to protect the interests of future generations.[5] Organizations working on longtermist topics include Cambridge University's Centre for the Study of Existential Risk,[6] Oxford University's Future of Humanity Institute[7] and Global Priorities Institute, 80,000 Hours,[8] Open Philanthropy,[9] the Future of Life Institute,[10] and others.

Practical implications

Researchers studying longtermism believe that among the most valuable ways to improve the long-term future are efforts to mitigate existential risks and to bring about other positive "trajectory changes".[11]

An existential risk is "a risk that threatens the destruction of humanity’s longterm potential",[12] including risks which cause human extinction or permanent societal collapse. Examples of these risks include nuclear war, natural and engineered pandemics, extreme climate change, stable global totalitarianism, and emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and nanotechnology.[13] Reducing any of these risks may significantly improve the future over long timescales by increasing the number and quality of future lives.[11][14]

Existential risks are extreme examples of what researchers call a "trajectory change".[11] However, there might be other ways to positively influence how the future will unfold. Some people think that increasing economic growth counts as a positive trajectory change since it will make future generations wealthier.[15] Others think that improving institutions like national governments or international governance bodies could bring about a positive trajectory change.[16]

Criticism

One objection to longtermism is that it relies on predictions of the effects of our actions over very long time horizons, which is difficult at best and impossible at worst.[17] In response to this challenge, researchers interested in longtermism have sought to identify "value lock in" events—events, such as human extinction, which we may influence in the near-term but that will have very long-lasting, predictable future effects.[18]

Another concern is that longtermism may lead to deprioritizing more immediate issues. For example, considering humanity's future in terms of the next 10,000 or 10 million years might lead to downplaying the short-term economic effects of climate change.[19]

See also

References

  1. Moorhouse, Fin (2021-01-27). "Introduction to Longtermism". Effective Altruism. Retrieved 2021-11-13.
  2. Samuel, Sigal (2021-11-03). "Would you donate to a charity that won't pay out for centuries?". Vox. Retrieved 2021-11-13.
  3. MacAskill, William (2019-07-25). "Longtermism". Effective Altruism Forum.
  4. Ord, Toby (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 52–53. ISBN 1-5266-0021-8.
  5. Samuel, Sigal (2021-07-02). "What we owe to future generations". Vox. Retrieved 2021-11-27.
  6. "Our Mission". www.cser.ac.uk. Retrieved 2021-11-28.
  7. "About Us: Future of Humanity Institute". The Future of Humanity Institute. Retrieved 2021-11-28.
  8. "About us: what do we do, and how can we help?". 80,000 Hours. Retrieved 2021-11-28.
  9. "Global Catastrophic Risks". Open Philanthropy. 2016-03-02. Retrieved 2021-11-28.
  10. "Team". Future of Life Institute. Retrieved 2021-11-28.
  11. Beckstead, Nick (2013). "Chapter 1.1.2: How could we affect the far future?". On The Overwhelming Importance of Shaping the Far Future. New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
  12. Ord, Toby (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 59. ISBN 1-5266-0021-8.
  13. Ord, Toby (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 213–214. ISBN 1-5266-0021-8.
  14. Bostrom, Nick (2013). "Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority". Global Policy. 4 (1): 15–31.
  15. Cowen, Tyler (2018). Stubborn Attachments: A Vision for a Society of Free, Prosperous, and Responsible Individuals. Stripe Press. ISBN 978-1732265134.
  16. John, Tyler M.; MacAskill, William (2021). "Longtermist institutional reform". In Cargill, Natalie; John, Tyler M. (eds.). The Long View (PDF). UK: FIRST Strategic Insight. ISBN 978-0-9957281-8-9.
  17. Tarsney, Christian (2019). "The epistemic challenge to longtermism". GPI Working Paper. No. 10-2019.
  18. MacAskill, William (2021). McMahan, Jeff; Campbell, Tim; James, Goodrich (eds.). "Are we living at the hinge of history?". Ethics and Existence: The Legacy of Derek Parfit. Oxford University Press.
  19. Torres, Phil (2021-10-19). Dresser, Sam (ed.). "Why longtermism is the world's most dangerous secular credo". Aeon. Retrieved 2021-11-02.

Further reading

  • Longtermism.com, Online introduction and resource compilation on longtermism
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.