Transgender rights in the United Kingdom

Transgender rights in the United Kingdom have been developing, with the rights and protection to the transgender community changing over time with reductions and increases over time. These include various laws within the United Kingdom that refer to identity documents, marriage rights, and anti-discrimination measures used by or pertaining to transgender people, in the areas of employment, education, housing and social services, amongst others.

Trans people have been able to change their passports and driving licences to indicate their preferred binary gender since at least 1970. Transgender people were, prior to the ruling in Corbett v Corbett, able to have their birth certificate informally amended to reflect their gender identity. The ruling prevented the amendment of the sex marker on birth certificates for other than clerical errors. The 2002 Goodwin v United Kingdom ruling by the European Court of Human Rights resulted in parliament passing the Gender Recognition Act of 2004 to allow people to apply to change their legal gender, through application to a tribunal called the Gender Recognition Panel. The application requires the submission of medical evidence and a statutory declaration. The tribunal is made up of medical and legal members appointed by the Lord Chancellor.

Anti-discrimination measures protecting transgender people have existed in the UK since 1999, and were strengthened in the 2000s to include anti-harassment wording. Later in 2010, gender reassignment was included as a protected characteristic in the Equality Act. With the 2013 introduction of same-sex marriage, it became possible for a spouse to legally change their gender without requiring a divorce in the UK, with the exception of Northern Ireland, where this became an option nearly a decade later on the 13th of January 2020.

Medical classification

In December 2002, the Lord Chancellor's office published the Government Policy Concerning Transsexual People document that categorically states that transsexualism "is not a mental illness", but rather a "widely recognised medical condition" characterised by an "overpowering sense of different gender identity".[1]

Medical treatment for minors

In December 2020, the High Court ruled that children under 16 could not consent to puberty blockers, with NHS England consequently stating that any requirement for puberty blockers would have to be brought through a court order before treatment. On 29 January 2021, the High Court's order was stayed, pending appeal before March 2022; as of April 2019, however, no minors were being referred for puberty blockers or hormone treatment on the NHS.[2][3] As of February 2021, it had not been made clear how a court order could be brought in order for a minor to access puberty blockers, and no court orders had yet been issued, with waiting lists for hormone treatment for adults on the NHS heavily exceeding targets of 18 weeks to first appointment.[4][5]

Gender recognition

The Gender Recognition Act 2004 was drafted in response to court rulings from the European Court of Human Rights. On 11 July 2002, in Goodwin & I v United Kingdom, (a.k.a. Christine Goodwin & I v United Kingdom [2002] 2 FCR 577), the European Court of Human Rights ruled that rights to privacy and family life were being infringed and that "the UK Government had discriminated based on the following: Violation of Article 8 and Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights". Following this judgment, the UK government had to introduce new legislation to comply. In response to its obligation, the UK Parliament passed the Gender Recognition Act 2004, which effectively granted full legal recognition for binary transgender people.[6]

Since 4 April 2005, as per the Gender Recognition Act 2004, it is possible for transgender people to change their legal gender in the UK. Transgender people must present evidence to a Gender Recognition Panel, which considers their case and issues a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC); they must have transitioned two years before a GRC is issued. It is not a requirement for sex reassignment surgery to have taken place. However, such surgery will be accepted as part of the supporting evidence for a case where it has taken place. There is formal approval of medical gender reassignment available either on the National Health Service (NHS) or privately. If the person's birth or adoption was registered in the United Kingdom, they may also be issued a new birth certificate after their details have been entered onto the Gender Recognition Register.

In June 2020 a report published by the European Commission ranked the procedure established in the Gender Recognition Act 2004 as amongst the worst in Europe with "intrusive medical requirements", which means it now lags behind international human rights standards.[7]

In September 2020 the UK government published the results of a public consultation into reform of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 which had been launched in 2018.[8] This showed majority support for wide ranging changes, however the UK Government decided not to change the current law.[9]

Cost

In April 2021, it was reported that the fee for a Gender Recognition Certificate would be reduced from £140 to £5 in early May 2021.[10][11] People applying for a GRC still require additional documents that separately increase the cost of applying for a GRC to far more than this £5 fee, leaving many still financially unable to apply for the certificate.

The title "Mx." is widely accepted in the United Kingdom by government organisations and businesses as an alternative for non-binary people, while the Higher Education Statistics Agency allows the use of non-binary gender markers for students in higher education.[12] In 2015, early day motion EDM660 was registered with Parliament,[13] calling for citizens to be permitted access to the 'X' marker on passports. In 2016, a formal petition through the Parliamentary Petitions Service calling for EDM660 to be passed into law gained only 2,500 signatures before closing.[14][15]

In September 2015, the Ministry of Justice responded to a petition calling for self-determination of legal gender, stating that they were not aware of "any specific detriment" experienced by non-binary people unable to have their genders legally recognised.[16] In January 2016, the Trans Inquiry Report by the Women and Equalities Committee called for protection from discrimination of non-binary people under the Equality Act, for the 'X' gender marker to be added to passports, and for a wholesale review into the needs of non-binary people by the government within six months.[17]

In May 2021, the Government rejected a petition to legally recognise non-binary identities, claiming there would be "complex practical consequences" for such a move.[18] The petition has passed the threshold of 100,000 signatures to be considered for a debate in Parliament, but as of 30 May 2021 this debate had not yet been scheduled.[19]

Discrimination protections

The Sex Discrimination Act 1975 made it illegal to discriminate on the ground of anatomical sex in employment, education, and the provision of housing, goods, facilities and services.[6] The Sex Discrimination (Gender Reassignment) Regulations 1999 extended the existing Sex Discrimination Act, and made it illegal to discriminate against any person on the grounds of gender reassignment, but only in the areas of employment and vocational training.[6]

The Equality Act 2006 introduced the Gender Equality Duty in Scotland, which made public bodies obliged to take seriously the threat of harassment or discrimination of transsexual people in various situations. In 2008, the Sex Discrimination (Amendment of Legislation) Regulations extended existing regulation to outlaw discrimination when providing goods or services to transsexual people. The definition of "transsexual" used in the Gender Equality Duty is still technically the same as that in the Sexual Discrimination Act; however, this legislation was meant to prevent discrimination against all transgender people.[6]

The Equality Act 2010 officially adds "gender reassignment" as a "protected characteristic", stating that:[20]

A person has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment if the person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning the person's sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex.

This law provides protection for transgender people at work, in education, as a consumer, when using public services, when buying or renting property, or as a member or guest of a private club or association.[21] Protection against discrimination by association with a trans person is also included.

The Equality Act 2010 prohibits discrimination against people with the protected characteristic of gender reassignment in the provision of separate and single-sex services but includes an exception that service providers can use in exceptional circumstances.[22] In general, organisations that provide separate or single‑sex services for women and men, or provide different services to women and men, are required to treat trans people according to the gender role in which they present.[22]

However, in limited circumstances, treating trans people differently may be lawful. For example, excluding a trans woman from group support sessions within a sexual abuse crisis centre and instead electing to provide individual support privately, may be justified if their presence is considered detrimental to the support of other service users.[23] This is likely to meet the legal requirements of the exemption in the Equality Act which states that it may be applied as "a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim". The exclusion can only be applied on an individual case-by-case basis and must not form part of a blanket policy for the treatment of trans people (Equality Act 2010, Schedule 3, Part 7; Equality Act 2010, Schedule 23).

In 2018, a spokesperson for the Government Equalities Office maintained that the government had no plans to amend the Equality Act 2010 either directly or indirectly, and that it planned to maintain the Equality Act's "provision for single and separate sex spaces".[24]

In addition to the basic legal protection afforded by the Equality Act 2010, the UK government has published good practice guidance on providing services that are inclusive of trans people as customers, clients, users or members.[23]

Some transgender rights activists, such as Transgender Equality & Rights in Scotland, advocate adding the category of "gender identity", "in order to be more clearly inclusive of those transgender people who do not identify as transsexual and do not intend to change the gender in which they live". They also want to introduce measures that would clarify protections from discrimination in education, certain kinds of employment, and medical insurance.[25]

In 2020, the court case Taylor v Jaguar Land Rover Ltd ruled that non-binary gender and genderfluid identities fall under the protected characteristic of gender reassignment in the Equality Act 2010.[26]

Marriage

Corbett v Corbett

The legal case of Corbett v Corbett, heard in November and December 1969 with a February 1971 decision, set a legal precedent regarding the status of transsexual people in the United Kingdom. It was brought at a time when the UK did not recognise mutual consent as reason enough to dissolve a marriage. Arthur Corbett, the plaintiff, sought a method of dissolving his marriage to the model April Ashley, who had brought a petition under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 for maintenance. As a result of Justice Ormrod's decision, the marriage was deemed void, and an unofficial correcting of birth certificates for transsexual and intersex people ceased.

In the 1980s and 1990s, the pressure group, Press for Change, campaigned in support for transgender and transsexual people to be allowed to marry,[27] and helped take several cases to the European Court of Human Rights.[28] In Rees v. United Kingdom (1986), the court decided that the UK was not violating any human rights.[29]

Situation since the Gender Recognition Act 2004

Since the Gender Recognition Act 2004, transgender people who are married have been required to divorce or annul their marriage in order for them to be issued with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC). The government chose to retain this requirement in the Act as, effectively, it would have legalised a small category of same-sex marriages. The Civil Partnership Act 2004 allowed the creation of civil partnerships between same-sex couples, but a married couple that includes a transgender partner cannot simply re-register their new status. They must first have their marriage dissolved, gain legal recognition of the new gender and then register for a civil partnership. This is like any divorce with the associated paperwork and costs.

With the legalisation of same-sex marriage in England and Wales, existing marriages will continue where one or both parties change their legal gender and both parties wish to remain married. However, civil partnerships continue where only both parties change their gender simultaneously and wish to remain in their civil partnership. This restriction remains as, effectively, it would legalise a small category of opposite-sex civil partnerships. The legislation also does not restore any of the marriages of transgender people that were forcibly annulled as a precondition for them securing a GRC; a GRC will not be issued unless the spouse of the transgender person has consented.

If the spouse does not consent, the marriage must be terminated before a GRC may be issued. Scottish same-sex marriage law does not allow a person to veto their spouse's gender recognition in this manner.[30]

Legality of sex without disclosure of trans status

Under a 2013 legal precedent in England and Wales, concerning the case of an underage transgender boy having sex with a cisgender girl, consensual sexual intercourse in which both parties are not aware of each other's trans status or lack thereof can be prosecuted as rape by gender fraud.[31]

In 2016, trans man Kyran Lee was likewise convicted of sexual assault for having consensual sex without disclosing his trans status.[32]

Transgender rights in: Right to change legal name Right to change legal gender Right to access medical treatment Right to marry Military service Anti-discrimination laws Hate speech/hate crime laws
England and Wales Deed poll and statutory declaration available Gender Recognition Act 2004 Since 1999 via court case of North West Lancashire Health Authority v A, D and G. Since 2004; requires divorce in some circumstances in the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 Since 1999 Equality Act 2010, with some exemptions s146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
Scotland Deed poll and statutory declaration available Gender Recognition Act 2004 Since 2004 Since 1999 Equality Act 2010, with some exemptions
Northern Ireland Deed poll and statutory declaration Gender Recognition Act 2004 Since 2020 Since 1999 The Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1976

Public awareness

The UK-wide public consultation on reforming the process of obtaining a Gender Recognition Certificate, launched by the government of Theresa May in 2018,[33][34] has led to a "toxic culture war" according to CNN.[35]

Christine Burns, author of Trans Britain: Our Journey from the Shadows, stated in a CNN article that The Times and The Sunday Times newspapers published "six trans related pieces in 2016" but "over 150 in 2017 and similarly each year since".[35] In evidence given to the Edinburgh Employment Tribunal in 2019, Burns said that during 2016, both The Times and Sunday Times began to publish a larger number of trans-related stories, and by 2017 had "uniquely" published "over 130" trans-related items, which she described as a "trans backlash" stemming from 2015.[36]

Public attitudes

A report on "Attitudes to transgender people" commissioned by the Equality and Human Rights Commission found that 84% of the British public described themselves as "not prejudiced at all" towards transgender people and 76% believed that prejudice against transgender people was "always or mostly wrong".[37] Stonewall said the anti-trans discourse in the media does not reflect public opinion.[38] A 2020 survey highlighted a generation gap, and found that 56% of Generation Z (ages 18 to 24) believed that transgender rights have not gone far enough, compared to only 20% of baby boomers (ages 55 to 75).[39][40][41] Similarly, a YouGov survey found that 57 per cent of women believed that trans people should be able to self-identify as their chosen gender; the survey also found that 70% of Labour voters supported self-identification while only 13% opposed it; furthermore the study found that support for trans rights was most profound in urban areas, with only 14% in London opposed.[42] A study entitled "The 'fault lines' in the UK's culture wars" found that people who opposed trans rights were more likely to rely on incorrect information.[43][44]

Transphobia and TERF debate

Several commentators have described the level of transphobia in British society in general (including the negative coverage of trans-related issues in the media) and the support for trans-exclusionary radical feminism (TERF) in particular as unusual compared to other Western countries. The discourse on transgender-related issues in the United Kingdom has been called a "TERF war".[45][46][47][48][49] Lisa Tilley said the British media play a large role in advancing a transphobic agenda to demonise transgender people, and that "the effects are to make the UK one of the most transphobic countries in the world."[50] Drawing on theory of radicalisation, Craig McLean argues that discourse on transgender-related issues in the UK has been radicalised in response to the activities of new lobby groups that push "a radical agenda to deny the basic rights of trans people (...) under the cover of "free speech'".[51]

At several British universities student bodies have sought to ban trans-exclusionary radical feminists from appearing as speakers. In 2015 the University of Manchester Students' Union banned Julie Bindel from speaking at the university over concerns that her views would "incite hatred."[52] In 2018 the University of Bristol Students' Union (Bristol SU) adopted a motion that banned trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs) from appearing as speakers at Bristol SU events and that called upon the University to adopt the same policy. The motion said the TERF ban was necessary because TERF activity on the university campus "put[s] trans students' safety at risk [...] in direct violation of the aims outlined in the Code of Conduct."[53][54][55][56]

In November 2021, Dr. Adrian Harrop was forced to attend a tribunal held by the Department of Health's Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service to determine his fitness to continue practicing medicine, after he made several tweets in support of trans rights. Vice News reported that "One of the tweets deemed 'highly offensive' by the tribunal involved Harrop calling a woman who vocally opposes trans rights 'a venomous transphobic bigot', whose aim was to 'demonise trans people' while 'excluding them from public life'." The MPTS ultimately handed down a one month suspension for Harrop's tweets, stating in its ruling that "Harrop's actions in posting inappropriate tweets over a sustained period of time, in contradiction to the advice he was given, breached fundamental tenets of the profession. His actions brought the profession into disrepute, undermining public confidence in the profession and the standards of conduct expected from members of the profession."[57]

BBC coverage

The BBC, the United Kingdom's state-run media, has frequently drawn criticism from both pro-transgender activist groups and British politicians for its reporting on and policies towards trans issues. In December 2020, the head of the UK media regulator Ofcom issued condemning the BBC for balancing appearances by transgender people with activists from gender critical groups, calling it 'extremely inappropriate'.[58]

In October 2021, the BBC published the article 'We're being pressured into sex by some trans women', written by Caroline Lowbridge. It was produced by BBC Nottingham, a branch of BBC English Regions. The article claims that lesbians are being pressured by transgender women into having sex with them.[59] The article received widespread criticism among the LGBT community as transphobic. It drew particular attention for the inclusion of comments from female pornographic actress Lily Cade, who wrote a blog post after the article's publication calling for the "lynching" of trans women.[60] Cade's comments were subsequently removed from the article.[60]

Trans Activism UK, Trans Media Watch and Mermaids were critical of the article; an open letter with 20,000 signatories asked for the BBC to apologise. The Guardian and The Times reported that the article was met with backlash by BBC staff, including prior to its publication, while protests took place outside BBC offices. Criticisms centred on the inclusion of a social media poll from the anti-transgender group Get the L Out that reported 56% of 80 self-selected lesbians had been pressured into sex by transgender women. Critics also believed that Lowbridge's chosen interviewees had a narrow range of viewpoints. A Stonewall executive is quoted on the subject, as is the co-founder of the LGB Alliance, which was created in opposition to Stonewall after they began to campaign for transgender equality.

In November 2021, the BBC announced it was pulling out of Stonewall's diversity scheme, citing a need to remain impartial.[61]

See also


References

  1. "Government Policy concerning Transsexual People". People's rights / Transsexual people. U.K. Department for Constitutional Affairs. 2003. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008.
  2. Mulliner, Annabel (10 February 2021). "How are trans rights being threatened in the UK?". nouse.co.uk. Retrieved 24 April 2021.
  3. Parsons, Vic (2 December 2020). "Trans kids will not be referred for puberty blockers following High Court ruling, UK's only youth gender clinic confirms". PinkNews. Retrieved 24 April 2021.
  4. Savage, Rachel (15 February 2021). "British children in limbo over gender therapy after court ruling". Reuters. Retrieved 24 April 2021.
  5. "NHS maximum waiting time standards". House of Commons Library. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  6. "Transgender: what the law says". equalityhumanrights.com. Equality and Human Rights Commission. Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  7. "Legal gender recognition in the EU: the journeys of trans people towards full equality". European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved 8 October 2020.
  8. "Analysis of the responses to the Gender Recognition Act (2004) consultation". GOV.UK. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  9. "Changes to gender recognition laws ruled out". bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 7 October 2020.
  10. Parker, Jessica (8 April 2021). "Cost of changing legal gender cut to less than £10". bbc.co.uk/news. BBC News. Archived from the original on 7 April 2021. Retrieved 13 April 2021.
  11. Andersson, Jasmine (8 April 2021). "Gender Recognition Certificate's £5 price cut is 'a fig leaf' covering up much-needed reform, experts warn". inews.co.uk. Retrieved 13 April 2021.
  12. "HESA parameters for SEXID". Higher Education Statistics Agency. Archived from the original on 16 August 2016. Retrieved 2 May 2016.
  13. "Legal Recognition For People Who Do Not Associate With A Particular Gender". UK Parliament. Archived from the original on 21 May 2016. Retrieved 2 May 2016.
  14. Petition: Consider taking EDM660 forward into law, UK Parliament
  15. "Community Post: UK Govt Asked To Recognise Non-Binary Gender". BuzzFeed Community. Archived from the original on 17 September 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
  16. Duffy, Nick (12 September 2015). "Government claims there will be 'social consequences' if trans people can pick their legal gender". Pink News. Archived from the original on 22 August 2016. Retrieved 27 October 2016.
  17. Lodge, Cassian (15 January 2016). "The Trans Inquiry Report: A Non-Binary Summary". Beyond the Binary. Archived from the original on 27 October 2016. Retrieved 27 October 2016.
  18. Parsons, Vic (21 May 2021). "Non-binary legal recognition too 'complex' to introduce, UK government confirms". PinkNews. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
  19. "Over 100k people sign a petition calling for non-binary to be recognised as a legal gender". The Tab. 5 May 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2021.
  20. "Equality Act 2010". legislation.gov.uk. The National Archives. 2010. Archived from the original on 31 March 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  21. "Discrimination: your rights". GOV.UK. Retrieved 30 September 2018.
  22. "Services, Public functions and Associations: Statutory Code of Practice | Equality and Human Rights Commission". www.equalityhumanrights.com. Retrieved 1 September 2018.
  23. "Providing services for transgender customers: a guide". GOV.UK. Retrieved 1 September 2018.
  24. Kentish, Benjamin (25 June 2018). "Transgender people should not have right to use women-only spaces, government says". Independent. Retrieved 25 June 2018.
  25. "Equality Act 2010". ScottishTrans.org. Transgender Equality & Rights in Scotland. Archived from the original on 11 April 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  26. Wareham, Jamie. "Non-Binary People Protected By U.K. Equality Act, Says Landmark Ruling Against Jaguar Land Rover". Forbes.
  27. "British transsexuals to get right to get married". The New Zealand Herald. 10 December 2002. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  28. "Case Law - Trans Related cases in the European Court of Human Rights". Press for Change. Archived from the original on 25 February 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  29. "Transsexuals' rights" (PDF). European Court of Human Rights. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 July 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2015.
  30. "Scottish parliamentary committee votes to remove spousal veto from equal marriage bill". PinkNews. 16 January 2017. Archived from the original on 7 January 2016. Retrieved 2 November 2017.
  31. "McNally v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 1051". BAILII. 27 June 2013. Retrieved 23 October 2021.
  32. Feder, J. Lester (14 October 2016). "How An Online Love Affair Ended With A Trans Man Convicted Of Sexual Assault". buzzfeednews.com. BuzzFeed News. Archived from the original on 21 March 2019.
  33. Savage, Michael (23 July 2017). "Gender reassignment could be streamlined under proposal". The Observer. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  34. Duffy, Nick (18 May 2018). "Gender Recognition Act review will launch before summer, government says". PinkNews. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
  35. John, Tara (4 April 2020). "The quest for trans rights has exposed a deep divide in the UK. Scotland may show a way forward". CNN. Retrieved 4 April 2020.
  36. Burns, Christine. "Witness Statement re Edinburgh Employment Tribunal involving Katherine O'Donnell". Plain Sense. Plain Sense. Retrieved 16 October 2020.
  37. "Attitudes to transgender people | Equality and Human Rights Commission". www.equalityhumanrights.com.
  38. "New report tells us how the public actually feel about trans people". Stonewall. 11 August 2020.
  39. https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/majority-britons-say-transgender-people-face-discrimination-britain
  40. "Transgender rights and a generational divide".
  41. Reid-Smith, Tris (15 July 2020). "New poll exposes the fault lines in the battle for trans rights". Gay Star News.
  42. "Majority of women support trans people's right to self-identify despite years of relentless transphobia, eye-opening polling finds". Pink News. Retrieved 21 November 2021.
  43. "Majority who oppose trans rights and Black Lives Matter movement have warped sense of reality, according to science". uk.news.yahoo.com.
  44. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/fault-lines-in-the-uks-culture-wars.pdf
  45. "Inside the Great British TERF War". VICE. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  46. "Where J.K. Rowling's Transphobia Comes From". Vanity Fair. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  47. "How trans 'Harry Potter' fans are grappling with J.K. Rowling's legacy after her transphobic comments". USA Today. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  48. Pearce R, Erikainen S, Vincent B. TERF wars: An introduction. The Sociological Review. 2020;68(4):677-698. doi:10.1177/0038026120934713
  49. Hines S. Sex wars and (trans) gender panics: Identity and body politics in contemporary UK feminism. The Sociological Review. 2020;68(4):699-717. doi:10.1177/0038026120934684
  50. John, Tara. "Anti-trans rhetoric is rife in the British media. Little is being done to extinguish the flames". CNN. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
  51. McLean, Craig (2021). "The Growth of the Anti-Transgender Movement in the United Kingdom. The Silent Radicalization of the British Electorate". International Journal of Sociology: 1–10. doi:10.1080/00207659.2021.1939946. S2CID 237874806.
  52. "Julie Bindel banned from appearing at censorship debate over 'dangerous' trans views". Pink News. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
  53. "University of Bristol students vote to ban 'transphobic feminist speakers'". 2 March 2018.
  54. Turner, Camilla (1 March 2018). "Bristol University students seek to ban 'Terf' speakers who question transgender status of women" via www.telegraph.co.uk.
  55. Parker, Charlie. "Bristol University students vote to ban 'transphobic' feminists" via www.thetimes.co.uk.
  56. "Motion 10 - Prevent Future Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist - TERF - Groups from Holding Events at the University.pdf @ Bristol SU". www.bristolsu.org.uk.
  57. https://www.vice.com/en/article/k7wwxa/nhs-doctor-adrian-harrop-suspended. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  58. https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/12/15/ofcom-melanie-dawes-bbc-lgb-alliance-john-nicolson-trans-transphobia-balance/. Missing or empty |title= (help)
  59. Andersson, Jasmine (5 November 2021). "How a BBC article on trans women and lesbians became the eye of the storm in a transphobia row". i. Retrieved 7 November 2021.
  60. Topping, Alexandra (4 November 2021). "BBC changes online article at centre of transphobia row". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 November 2021.
  61. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-59232736. Missing or empty |title= (help)
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.