World Intellectual Property Indicators
World Intellectual Property Indicators is an annual report published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), providing a wide range of indicators covering the areas of intellectual property.[1] It draws on data from national and regional IP offices, the WIPO, the World Bank, and UNESCO. The WIPO have published the reports annually since 2009.[2][3]
Patents
Patent applications for the top 20 offices[4][5][6][7][8]
| Country | 2020 Rank | 2020 Patent applications | 2019 Rank | 2019 Patent applications | 2018 Rank | 2018 Patent applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1,497,159 | 1 | 1,400,661 | 1 | 1,542,002 | |
| 2 | 597,172 | 2 | 621,453 | 2 | 597,141 | |
| 3 | 288,472 | 3 | 307,969 | 3 | 313,567 | |
| 4 | 226,759 | 4 | 218,975 | 4 | 209,992 | |
| European Patent Office | 5 | 180,346 | 5 | 181,479 | 5 | 174,397 |
| 6 | 62,105 | 6 | 67,434 | 6 | 67,898 | |
| 7 | 56,771 | 7 | 53,627 | 7 | 50,055 | |
| 8 | 34,984 | 9 | 35,511 | 8 | 37,957 | |
| 9 | 34,565 | 8 | 36,488 | 9 | 36,161 | |
| 10 | 29,294 | 10 | 29,758 | 10 | 29,957 | |
| 11 | 24,338 | 11 | 25,396 | 11 | 24,857 | |
| 13 | 20,649 | 12 | 19,250 | 12 | 20,941 | |
| 15 | 14,312 | 14 | 15,941 | 13 | 16,424 | |
| 14 | 14,313 | 15 | 15,869 | 14 | 16,222 | |
| 12 | 21,556 | 13 | 16,532 | 15 | 15,986 | |
| 17 | 12,030 | 17 | 12,147 | 16 | 12,823 | |
| 16 | 13,265 | 16 | 14,136 | 17 | 11,845 | |
| 18 | 11,008 | 19 | 10,127 | 18 | 9,821 | |
| 19 | 8,160 | 18 | 11,481 | 19 | 9,754 | |
| 20 | 8,158 | 21 | 8,088 | |||
| 21 | 20 | 8,172 | 20 | 8,149 |
Resident patent grants for the top 20 offices[9][5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Patent grants 2020 | Rank 2019 | Patent grants 2019 | Rank 2018 | Patent grants 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 530127 | 1 | 452804 | 1 | 432,147 | |
| 2 | 351993 | 2 | 354430 | 2 | 307,759 | |
| 3 | 179383 | 3 | 179910 | 3 | 194,525 | |
| European Patent Office | 5 | 133706 | 4 | 137782 | 4 | 127,603 |
| 4 | 134766 | 5 | 125661 | 5 | 119,012 | |
| 6 | 28788 | 6 | 34008 | 6 | 35,774 | |
| 8 | 21284 | 8 | 22009 | 7 | 23,499 | |
| 10 | 17778 | 10 | 17010 | 8 | 17,065 | |
| 11 | 17305 | 9 | 18255 | 9 | 16,367 | |
| 7 | 26361 | 7 | 23578 | 10 | 13,908 | |
| 12 | 12874 | 11 | 13593 | 11 | 12249 | |
| 9 | 20407 | 12 | 10947 | 12 | 9966 | |
| 16 | 7981 | 13 | 10514 | 16 | 6374 | |
| 17 | 7726 | 14 | 8702 | 14 | 8921 | |
| 14 | 9152 | 15 | 8617 | 15 | 6424 | |
| 18 | 7658 | 16 | 6780 | 13 | 9651 | |
| 13 | 9772 | 18 | 5948 | 17 | 5982 | |
| 20 | 4668 | 19 | 4197 | |||
| 19 | 5386 | 20 | 4188 | 18 | 5172 | |
| 15 | 8206 | 21 | 4106 |
Resident patent applications per GDP for the top 20 origins[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2019 | Patent applications per GDP 2019 |
Rank 2018 | Patent applications per GDP 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7779 | 1 | 8,561 | |
| 2 | 5520 | 2 | 6,183 | |
| 3 | 4691 | 3 | 5,101 | |
| 4 | 1642 | 4 | 1,924 | |
| 5 | 1634 | 5 | 1,831 | |
| 6 | 1389 | 6 | 1,565 | |
| 9 | 1127 | 7 | 1,346 | |
| 8 | 1128 | 8 | 1,320 | |
| 7 | 1130 | 9 | 1,225 | |
| 10 | 927 | 10 | 1,078 | |
| 11 | 881 | 12 | 1052 | |
| 12 | 786 | 13 | 934 | |
| 13 | 765 | 11 | 1059 | |
| 14 | 599 | 15 | 673 | |
| 15 | 583 | 14 | 697 | |
| 16 | 557 | 16 | 659 | |
| 17 | 535 | 17 | 617 | |
| 18 | 467 | |||
| 19 | 389 | 18 | 607 | |
| 20 | 376 |
Resident patent applications per million population for the top 20 origins[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Patent applications per million population 2020 |
Rank 2019 | Patent applications per million population 2019 |
Rank 2018 | Patent applications per million population 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3485 | 1 | 3319 | 1 | 3148 | |
| 2 | 1807 | 2 | 1943 | 2 | 2005 | |
| 3 | 1099 | 3 | 1122 | 3 | 1081 | |
| 4 | 959 | 4 | 890 | 4 | 1001 | |
| 5 | 819 | 5 | 884 | 5 | 884 | |
| 6 | 818 | 6 | 869 | 6 | 871 | |
| 8 | 628 | 7 | 645 | 7 | 629 | |
| 9 | 597 | 8 | 601 | 8 | 578 | |
| 7 | 630 | 9 | 548 | 9 | 564 | |
| 11 | 492 | 10 | 530 | 10 | 537 | |
| 10 | 496 | 11 | 496 | 11 | 489 | |
| 12 | 347 | 12 | 363 | 12 | 369 | |
| 13 | 313 | 13 | 303 | 16 | 279 | |
| 14 | 284 | 14 | 297 | 13 | 318 | |
| 15 | 281 | 15 | 288 | 14 | 285 | |
| 16 | 269 | 16 | 287 | |||
| 17 | 263 | 17 | 272 | 15 | 280 | |
| 18 | 246 | 18 | 229 | 17 | 220 | |
| 20 | 168 | 19 | 165 | 18 | 175 | |
| 19 | 178 | 20 | 151 | 19 | 170 |
Patents in force for the top 20 offices[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Patents in force 2020 | Rank 2019 | Patents in force 2019 | Rank 2018 | 2018 Patent in force |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3348531 | 1 | 3131427 | 1 | 3,063,494 | |
| 2 | 3057844 | 2 | 2670784 | 2 | 2,366,314 | |
| 3 | 2039040 | 3 | 2053879 | 3 | 2,054,276 | |
| 4 | 1096721 | 4 | 1048079 | 4 | 1,001,163 | |
| 5 | 834734 | 5 | 772358 | 5 | 703,606 | |
| 6 | 682245 | 6 | 641887 | 7 | 572,063 | |
| 7 | 674334 | 7 | 640883 | 6 | 602,084 | |
| 8 | 348888 | 8 | 339072 | 8 | 306,768 | |
| 9 | 266189 | 9 | 263688 | 9 | 256,419 | |
| 10 | 250143 | 10 | 246124 | 10 | 244,581 | |
| 11 | 224455 | 11 | 222666 | |||
| 12 | 217386 | 12 | 221884 | 11 | 196,707 | |
| 13 | 212855 | 14 | 205675 | |||
| 14 | 209751 | 13 | 208313 | 12 | 194,393 | |
| 15 | 192668 | 15 | 187928 | 13 | 184,559 | |
| 16 | 165249 | 18 | 145728 | 14 | 167,594 | |
| 17 | 159581 | 16 | 171654 | 15 | 156,244 | |
| 18 | 159304 | 17 | 159244 | 19 | 98,245 | |
| 19 | 113330 | 19 | 113449 | 17 | 113,286 | |
| 20 | 111789 | 21 | 107032 | 16 | 115,893 |
Top patent applicants worldwide 2003–2012[10][5][6][7]
| Rank | Applicant | Country | Patent families |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Panasonic | 111,653 | |
| 2 | Samsung Electronics | 95,852 | |
| 3 | Canon | 74,193 | |
| 4 | Toyota | 73,220 | |
| 5 | Toshiba | 65,151 | |
| 6 | LG Electronics | 64,593 | |
| 7 | Seiko Epson | 62,305 | |
| 8 | IBM | 45,473 | |
| 9 | Ricoh | 45,306 | |
| 10 | Sony | 44,261 |
Top patent applicants worldwide 2013 - 2018 [11][12][5][6][7]
| 2019 | Rank 2018 | Top applicants 2018 | Top applicants 2018 country | 2018 | Rank 2018 | Top applicants 2013 -2015 | Applicant country | Patent families 2013 -2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,411 | 1 | Huawei | 5,405 | 1 | Canon | 24,006 | ||
| 2,661 | 2 | Mitsubishi Electric | 2,812 | 2 | Samsung Electronics | 21,836 | ||
| 2,334 | 3 | Samsung Electronics | 1,997 | 3 | State Grid Corporation of China | 21,635 | ||
| 2,127 | 4 | Qualcomm | 2,404 | 4 | Mitsubishi Electric | 15,277 | ||
| 1,927 | 5 | Oppo | 1,042 | 5 | IBM | 14,972 | ||
| 1,864 | 6 | Boe Technology | 1,813 | 6 | Toyota | 14,840 | ||
| 1,698 | 7 | Ericsson | 1,645 | 7 | Huawei | 14,605 | ||
| 1,691 | 8 | Ping An Technology | 336 | 7 | Toshiba | 14,567 | ||
| 1,687 | 9 | Robert Bosch GmbH | 1,525 | 9 | LG Electronics | 14,561 | ||
| 1,646 | 10 | LG Electronics | 1,697 | 10 | Robert Bosch GmbH | 12,598 |
Top PCT patent applicants 2019 and 2020 [5][6][7]
| Top PCT patent applicants 2019 | Country | 2020 Rank | 2020 PCT applications | 2019 Rank | 2019 PCT applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huawei | 1 | 5464 | 1 | 4411 | |
| Samsung Electronics | 2 | 3093 | 3 | 2334 | |
| Mitsubishi Electric | 3 | 2810 | 2 | 2661 | |
| LG Electronics | 4 | 2759 | 10 | 1646 | |
| Qualcomm | 5 | 2173 | 4 | 2127 | |
| Ericsson | 6 | 1989 | 7 | 1698 | |
| BOE Technology | 7 | 1892 | 6 | 1864 | |
| Oppo | 8 | 1801 | 5 | 1927 | |
| Sony | 9 | 1793 | 13 | 1566 | |
| Panasonic | 10 | 1611 | 12 | 1567 |
Trademarks
Trademark applications top 20 offices[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Total 2020 | Rank 2019 | Total 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9345757 | 1 | 7833010 | |
| 2 | 870306 | 2 | 672644 | |
| 6 | 421166 | 3 | 546224 | |
| 3 | 541750 | 4 | 454925 | |
| European Patent Office | 4 | 438511 | 5 | 407675 |
| 5 | 424583 | 6 | 367768 | |
| 11 | 290194 | 7 | 311647 | |
| 7 | 398240 | 8 | 306982 | |
| 9 | 319945 | 9 | 284090 | |
| 8 | 363708 | 10 | 282449 | |
| 10 | 297933 | 11 | 246244 | |
| 13 | 264669 | 12 | 235937 | |
| 12 | 278699 | 13 | 220369 | |
| 16 | 147267 | 14 | 174287 | |
| 14 | 162541 | 15 | 160185 | |
| 15 | 149540 | 16 | 140086 | |
| 18 | 108641 | 17 | 112381 | |
| 20 | 100872 | 18 | 97096 | |
| 19 | 101121 | 19 | 96326 | |
| 17 | 123787 | 20 | 85807 |
Resident trademark applications per GDP for the top origins [6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Trademark applications per GDP 2020 | Rank 2019 | Trademark applications per GDP 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50406 | 1 | 42605 | |
| 2 | 39620 | 2 | 33711 | |
| 3 | 35656 | 3 | 27241 | |
| 4 | 13933 | 4 | 12493 | |
| 5 | 13846 | 5 | 10573 | |
| 6 | 12310 | 7 | 10345 | |
| 7 | 12119 | 14 | 9123 | |
| 8 | 11756 | 8 | 10175 | |
| 9 | 10859 | 13 | 9203 | |
| 10 | 10545 | 6 | 10415 | |
| 11 | 10494 | 18 | 8469 | |
| 12 | 10478 | 24 | 6956 | |
| 13 | 10243 | 12 | 9522 | |
| 14 | 9769 | 20 | 8429 | |
| 15 | 9626 | 11 | 9607 | |
| 16 | 9297 | 10 | 9687 | |
| 15 | 9029 | |||
| 18 | 8809 | 31 | 6178 | |
| 19 | 8723 | 22 | 7021 | |
| 20 | 8572 | 16 | 8836 |
Resident trademark applications per million population for the top 20 origins [5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Trademark Application per million 2020 | Rank 2019 | Trademark Application per million 2019 |
| 1 | 6502 | 1 | 5425 | |
| 2 | 6267 | 2 | 5278 | |
| 6 | 4432 | 3 | 4774 | |
| 3 | 5214 | 4 | 4748 | |
| 4 | 5201 | 5 | 4419 | |
| 7 | 3964 | 6 | 3887 | |
| 15 | 2725 | 7 | 3736 | |
| 9 | 3835 | 8 | 3399 | |
| 11 | 3296 | 9 | 3321 | |
| 13 | 3150 | 10 | 3154 | |
| 10 | 3503 | 11 | 3087 | |
| 8 | 3930 | 12 | 2982 | |
| 12 | 3257 | 13 | 2619 | |
| 14 | 2890 | 14 | 2533 | |
| 16 | 2577 | 16 | 2438 | |
| 18 | 2413 | 17 | 2286 | |
| 20 | 2252 | 23 | 1950 | |
| 17 | 2444 | 28 | 1737 | |
| 19 | 2369 | 29 | 1709 | |
| 5 | 4450 | 94 | 0 |
Trademarks in force for the top 20 offices[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Marks in force 2020 | Rank 2019 | Marks in force 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30173085 | 1 | 25218516 | |
| 2 | 2605916 | 2 | 2779113 | |
| 3 | 2409005 | 3 | 2038798 | |
| 4 | 1973640 | 4 | 1918489 | |
| 5 | 1572726 | 5 | 1527702 | |
| European Patent Office | 6 | 1523465 | 6 | 1413406 |
| 7 | 1459790 | 7 | 1315878 | |
| 8 | 1380625 | 8 | 1305260 | |
| 9 | 1292538 | 9 | 1217805 | |
| 10 | 1220050 | 10 | 1125914 | |
| 11 | 968844 | 11 | 953153 | |
| 12 | 878713 | 12 | 857813 | |
| 13 | 828929 | 13 | 782602 | |
| 14 | 793934 | 14 | 767923 | |
| 15 | 713833 | 15 | 664335 | |
| Benelux Office for Intellectual Property | 16 | 657764 | 16 | 643832 |
| 17 | 655595 | 17 | 621231 | |
| 18 | 620860 | 18 | 617968 | |
| 19 | 523700 | 19 | 514825 | |
| 20 | 513086 | 20 | 505684 |
Top Madrid trademark applicants (2020 and 2019)[6][7]
| Applicant | Rank 2020 | Madrid aplications in 2020 | Rank 2019 | Madrid applications in 2019 |
| Novartis | 1 | 233 | 3 | 129 |
| Huawei | 2 | 197 | 2 | 164 |
| Shiseido | 3 | 130 | 9 | 70 |
| Adp Gauselmann | 4 | 123 | 19 | 39 |
| L'Oreal | 5 | 115 | 1 | 193 |
| Nintendo | 6 | 90 | 26 | 32 |
| Euro Games Technology | 7 | 84 | 14 | 48 |
| Apple | 8 | 80 | 4 | 104 |
| Syngenta | 9 | 78 | 27 | 30 |
| RIGO Trading SA | 10 | 70 | 5 | 102 |
Industrial designs
Application design counts for the top 10 offices[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Application design count 2020 |
Rank 2019 | Application design count 2019 |
Rank 2018 | Application design count 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 770362 | 1 | 711617 | 1 | 536,251 | |
| EUIPO | 2 | 113196 | 2 | 113319 | 2 | 105,116 |
| 3 | 70821 | 3 | 69360 | 3 | 50,678 | |
| 6 | 40638 | 6 | 44097 | 4 | 48,360 | |
| 5 | 47653 | 5 | 46202 | 5 | 45,735 | |
| 10 | 25364 | 9 | 31111 | 6 | 37,674 | |
| 4 | 50743 | 4 | 49848 | 7 | 33,449 | |
| 8 | 31650 | 8 | 32176 | 8 | 27,967 | |
| 7 | 32731 | 10 | 29896 | 9 | 24,688 | |
| 13 | 12376 | 12 | 16175 | 10 | 18853 | |
| 9 | 31196 | 7 | 37404 | 13 | 12495 | |
| 11 | 14984 | 11 | 17622 | 11 | 14774 | |
| 12 | 12793 | 13 | 13723 | 12 | 12632 | |
| 15 | 10160 | 14 | 12621 | 14 | 11640 | |
| 14 | 10589 | 15 | 10928 | 15 | 8943 | |
| 17 | 7359 | 16 | 8857 | 17 | 8029 | |
| 20 | 5619 | 17 | 7624 | 16 | 8166 | |
| 16 | 7530 | 18 | 7538 | 18 | 6818 | |
| 18 | 6263 | 19 | 6432 | 19 | 6111 | |
| 19 | 5818 | 20 | 5293 |
Resident application design counts for the top 20 origins[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2019 | Application design count 2019 |
Rank 2018 | Application design count 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 723327 | 1 | 957,241 | |
| 2 | 76458 | 2 | 643,987 | |
| 4 | 61601 | 3 | 390,996 | |
| 5 | 59185 | 4 | 361,977 | |
| 6 | 54344 | 5 | 221,478 | |
| 9 | 32885 | 6 | 196,841 | |
| 10 | 21966 | 7 | 153,532 | |
| 8 | 39936 | 8 | 141,278 | |
| 11 | 21291 | 9 | 124,407 | |
| 3 | 74736 | 10 | 114,337 | |
| 7 | 41368 | |||
| 12 | 17495 | |||
| 13 | 10016 | |||
| 14 | 9424 | |||
| 15 | 6400 | |||
| 16 | 5587 | |||
| 17 | 5493 | |||
| 18 | 5386 | |||
| 19 | 4602 | |||
| 20 | 4235 |
Resident application design counts per GDP for the top 20 origins [5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Designs applications per GDP 2020 | Rank 2019 | Designs applications per GDP 2019 |
| 1 | 3270 | 1 | 3076 | |
| 2 | 2926 | 2 | 2778 | |
| 4 | 1641 | 3 | 2152 | |
| 6 | 1426 | 4 | 1703 | |
| 3 | 1757 | 5 | 1668 | |
| 5 | 1515 | 6 | 1654 | |
| 16 | 665 | 7 | 1573 | |
| 8 | 1243 | 8 | 1360 | |
| 12 | 843 | 9 | 1300 | |
| 9 | 1104 | 10 | 1296 | |
| 7 | 1289 | 11 | 1260 | |
| 11 | 904 | 12 | 1000 | |
| 10 | 978 | 13 | 891 | |
| 20 | 580 | 14 | 887 | |
| 18 | 625 | 15 | 866 | |
| 14 | 739 | 16 | 757 | |
| 17 | 656 | 17 | 726 | |
| 13 | 815 | 19 | 708 | |
| 15 | 682 | 20 | 703 | |
| 19 | 594 | 22 | 537 |
Resident application design counts per million population for the top 20 origins[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Application design count per million population 2020 |
Rank 2019 | Application design count per million population 2019 |
Rank 2018 | Application design count per million population 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1236 | 1 | 1187 | 1 | 1163 | |
| 3 | 591 | 2 | 699 | 2 | 764 | |
| 2 | 656 | 3 | 676 | 3 | 720 | |
| 5 | 523 | 4 | 625 | 9 | 279 | |
| 4 | 537 | 5 | 495 | 4 | 495 | |
| 6 | 499 | 6 | 470 | 7 | 431 | |
| 7 | 407 | 7 | 414 | 6 | 435 | |
| 10 | 327 | 8 | 408 | 5 | 470 | |
| 9 | 338 | 10 | 389 | 8 | 405 | |
| 12 | 239 | 12 | 284 | 10 | 233 | |
| 15 | 204 | 14 | 238 | 11 | 211 | |
| 17 | 177 | 15 | 211 | 13 | 179 | |
| 16 | 178 | 17 | 182 | 12 | 185 | |
| 8 | 382 | 9 | 406 | |||
| 11 | 309 | 11 | 300 | |||
| 13 | 238 | 13 | 264 | |||
| 19 | 145 | 16 | 197 | |||
| 14 | 218 | 18 | 171 | |||
| 18 | 177 | 19 | 150 | |||
| 20 | 138 | 20 | 142 |
Industrial design registrations in force for the top 10 offices[5][6][7]
| Country | Rank 2020 | Registrations in force 2020 |
Rank 2019 | Registrations in force 2019 |
Rank 2018 | Registrations in force 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2187356 | 1 | 1789671 | 1 | 1610616 | |
| 3 | 369526 | 2 | 358803 | 2 | 344560 | |
| 2 | 371870 | 3 | 357959 | 3 | 336116 | |
| 4 | 263307 | 4 | 261669 | 4 | 257157 | |
| EUIPO | 5 | 251692 | 5 | 236935 | 5 | 223492 |
| 7 | 145656 | 6 | 135803 | 6 | 127197 | |
| 8 | 120778 | 7 | 99592 | 8 | 75476 | |
| 9 | 89397 | 8 | 86923 | 7 | 86288 | |
| 10 | 76203 | 9 | 83707 | |||
| 11 | 52413 | 10 | 53958 | 9 | 54726 | |
| 12 | 50559 | 11 | 50528 | 10 | 50069 | |
| 13 | 46972 | 12 | 49542 | 11 | 46910 | |
| 14 | 42906 | 13 | 41952 | 12 | 42277 | |
| 16 | 41161 | 14 | 38550 | 13 | 35898 | |
| 15 | 41509 | 15 | 37391 | 14 | 28999 | |
| 17 | 30697 | 16 | 29975 | 15 | 27305 | |
| 18 | 27778 | 17 | 28059 | 16 | 26866 | |
| 19 | 24573 | 18 | 27613 | |||
| 20 | 22569 | 19 | 21858 | 17 | 21707 | |
| 6 | 219148 | 125 |
Industrial designs per GDP top 20[5][6]
| Country | Rank 2019 | Industrial designs 2019 | Rank 2018 | Industrial designs 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3071 | 2 | 3057 | |
| 2 | 2782 | 1 | 3164 | |
| 3 | 1670 | 4 | 1704 | |
| 4 | 1648 | 3 | 2137 | |
| 5 | 1354 | 10 | 705 | |
| 6 | 1300 | 7 | 1389 | |
| 7 | 1255 | 5 | 1566 | |
| 8 | 999 | 8 | 1340 | |
| 9 | 886 | 9 | 1083 | |
| 10 | 866 | 6 | 1516 | |
| 11 | 567 | 11 | 686 | |
| 12 | 497 | 13 | 468 | |
| 13 | 447 | 14 | 447 | |
| 14 | 438 | 12 | 472 | |
| 15 | 275 | 15 | 345 | |
| 16 | 249 | 16 | 273 | |
| 17 | 137 | 18 | 124 | |
| 18 | 112 | 17 | 125 | |
| 19 | 111 | 19 | 102 | |
| 20 | 102 | 20 | 96 |
Hague top applicants in 2020 and 2019[7]
| Applicant | Rank 2020 | Hague applications 2020 | Rank 2019 | Hague applications 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG Electronics | 1 | 446 | 1 | 449 |
| Xiaomi | 2 | 216 | 3 | 111 |
| Samsung | 3 | 170 | 2 | 166 |
| Hyundai | 4 | 141 | 7 | 57 |
| Philips | 5 | 95 | 4 | 85 |
| VW | 6 | 84 | 5 | 73 |
| Hermes | 7 | 68 | 15 | 27 |
| Daimler | 8 | 65 | 10 | 42 |
| P & G | 9 | 57 | 6 | 65 |
| Alfred Karcher | 10 | 47 | 12 | 35 |
Controversies
Taiwanese patents
Since Taiwan (ROC) is not a member of the United Nations, the number of patents filed in Taiwan is not reported separately from China in the Indicators. The number of patent applications filed with the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) in 2018 was 73,431,[13] which would place it in 6th place worldwide for that year, or 2nd place per capita. In 2014, Bloomberg ranked Taiwan #1 in Patent Activity, using UN data.[14][15] The last WIPO Indicators report to mention the name Taiwan was in 2017, noting the large number of patents by Foxconn.[16][17][18][19]
China has been criticized for its efforts in the UN to reduce the visibility of Taiwan,[20][21] including via WIPO; in 2020 Beijing reportedly retaliated to the failed election of a Chinese director-general of the organization by preventing the Wikimedia Foundation from gaining observer status at the WIPO, on the grounds that Wikimedia has a Taiwan subsidiary.[22][23][24]
References
- "Launch of World Intellectual Property Indicators – 2015 Edition". www.wipo.int.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators". World Intellectual Property Organization. 2018. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
- "WIPO IP Statistics Data Center". www3.wipo.int. Retrieved 2021-08-27.
- "Publications: World Intellectual Property Indicators (WIPI)". www.wipo.int. Retrieved 2021-08-06.
- World Intellectual Property Organization (2020). World Intellectual Property Indicators 2020. www.wipo.int. World IP Indicators (WIPI). World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). doi:10.34667/tind.42184. ISBN 9789280532012. Retrieved 2021-08-26.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators 2019". www.wipo.int. Retrieved 2021-08-26.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators 2021" (PDF). WIPO. Retrieved 30 November 2021.
- "Data" (PDF). www.wipo.int. 2019.
- "Data" (PDF). www.wipo.int. 2019.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators" (PDF). World Intellectual Property Indicators. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2015. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
- "China Becomes Top Filer of International Patents in 2019". www.wipo.int. Retrieved 2020-05-07.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators" (PDF). World Intellectual Property Indicators. World Intellectual Property Organization. 2018. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
- "TIPO Statistics Report: Patent and Trademark Applications in 2018". Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. 18 March 2019. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- Lu, Wei; Chan, Marcus (6 August 2017). "In Global Innovation Race, Taiwan Is Tops in Patents, Israel Leads in R&D - Bloomberg". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2017-08-06. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
- "MOST INNOVATIVE IN THE WORLD 2014: COUNTRIES" (PDF). Bloomberg. 13 March 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-13.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators 2017" (PDF). WIPO. World Intellectual Property Organization.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators 2018" (PDF). WIPO. World Intellectual Property Organization.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators 2019" (PDF). WIPO. World Intellectual Property Organization.
- "World Intellectual Property Indicators 2020" (PDF). WIPO. World Intellectual Property Organization.
- Horton, Chris (8 May 2017). "Blocked by China, Taiwan Presses to Join U.N. Agency's Meeting". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- Lee, Kristine. "It's Not Just the WHO: How China Is Moving on the Whole U.N." POLITICO. Politico. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- Glosserman, Brad (9 March 2020). "China loses a skirmish in fight for global influence". The Japan Times. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- Hui, Mary (25 September 2020). "Beijing blocked Wikimedia from a UN agency because of "Taiwan-related issues"". Quartz. Retrieved 21 February 2021.
- Magnier, Mark (30 September 2020). "Beijing blocks Wikipedia from UN agency to resist 'Western values': analysts". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 21 February 2021.